In affirming the imposition of fines for unlicensed contracting, the Court held that a formal administrative hearing is necessary only where the material facts are in dispute.

The appeal arises from a dispute over a failed delivery of garage doors. After a default was entered against the subcontractor, it continued to oppose a motion for summary judgment filed by the general contractor, arguing that the default did not preclude it from contesting the amount of damages to which the general contractor was entitled.

The request came five and a half years into litigation and the denial resulted in summary judgment in favor of a shell contractor attempting to foreclose a $220,000.00 lien.

The decision confirms that where a surety enters into a settlement payment with a project owner, the contractor is entitled to setoff that payment against a subsequent judgment obtained against a contractor for the same damages.

In a short opinion, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a final judgment foreclosing a lien in favor of a general contractor. While the opinion is short and without elaboration, reviewing the underlying trial docket raises questions about the acceptable forms for contractor’s payment affidavits and pleading affirmative defenses relating to lien claims.

Since 2019, roofing contractors in Florida have been subject to a litany of new regulations, including restrictions on advertising methods and certain disclosure requirements in their contracts. On May 2, 2024, Governor DeSantis signed HB 939, which becomes law on July 1, 2024. The new statute imposes new disclosure requirements on roofing contractors and gives homeowners new contract cancellation rights. Roofing contractors in Florida need to evaluate their contracts and contact their attorneys to ensure they comply with the new requirements.

The decision issued by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal found that where a property owner alleged in its complaint that the lien should be discharged due to the contractor’s failure to serve a notice to owner, 713.21(4) did not apply.

The latest in a series of decisions by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals confirms an insurers duty to defend contractors against complaints of defective work and damages during construction. The three appeals, stretching from 2019 through 2024, provide a lot of insight into the importance of the allegations of the complaint, how coverage can be affected by them, and the breadth of the duty to defend even where coverage may be questionable.

The contractor amended its construction lien, which was then transferred to a bond and contested by the property owner after the start of litigation. When the contractor failed to add the bond’s surety to the lawsuit within 60 days, the property owner sought summary judgment and obtained an order finding the lien was extinguished based on the operation of two sections of Florida’s Construction Lien law.

The changes affects plan requirements for window, door, and garage door replacements; make changes to the sections governing private providers; impose new deadlines for permit application approvals and penalties for failing to meet them; and new standards for certain unvented spaces.

Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment entered in favor of the construction company’s president, finding that fact issues remained about whether the president ordered the company’s employee to place a tarp on a roof without also providing appropriate safety equipment.

The new statute would affect low voltage electric fence installations and limits municipalities from imposing requirements on low voltage alarm system projects that exceed those set forth in 553.793, Florida Statutes.

The statute modifies three sections of Florida’s Contractor Licensing Statute. First it expands the type of relief that can be awarded by local licensing boards and imposes requirements on their recommended penalties. It also increases the amount of funds the Homeowners’ Construction Industry Recovery Fund can award, starting January 2025. Finally, it adjusts the scope of electrical contractor specialty licensing as it relates to advertising signs.

The new statute modifies the definitions of work that can be performed by Class A and B HVAC contractors and Mechanical contractors in Florida to include additional electrical work. It also requires warranties on HVAC systems to be transferable and eliminates certain hurdles to transferability.

The new statute changes the requirements that an individual must meet to obtain a journeyman’s license for plumbing, pipefitting, mechanical or HVAC, electrical, and alarm systems trades, and makes reciprocity between counties a requirement.

The proposed statute modifies 489.147, Florida Statutes, which was enacted in 2021 and governs certain prohibited practices for roofing and other contractors operating on insurance-funded projects or in emergency areas. If the statute becomes law, homeowners would be able to cancel contracts without penalty within 10 days of signing under certain circumstances.

The statute moves the expiration of local licensing from July 1, 2024 to July 1, 2025, and requires the Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board to issue registered licenses to contractors that had certain local licenses from 2021 through 2023 in areas where those local licenses have been phased out.

The statute, if enacted, would require a builder of a newly constructed single family residence, duplex, triplex, quadruplex, or manufactured home to provide a one year warranty on all equipment, materials, or workmanship where a defect in those items results in a material violation of the Florida Building Code.

The proposed bills would more specifically define the work allowed to be done by commercial pool/spa contractors, more specifically define the limits imposed on residential pool/spa contractors, and also more clearly define the scope of work that servicers can perform.

If enacted, contractors licensed for less than five years, or contracting in emergency areas within 18 months following the emergency, or that had been disciplined within the last five years would be required to escrow any deposit of $10,000.00 or higher. Failure to do so would be a violation of Chapter 489, Florida Statutes, and be a felony.